DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 2 Begins

[MysticZach via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 18:55:08 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:

> I really like how the syntax turned out. My only remaining 
> peeve is the `ContractParameters` nomenclature in the grammar 
> section, because it implies that asserts are contracts.

Maybe I should have stuck with AssertParameters. That can easily 
be fixed.