DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 2 Begins

[MysticZach via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 19:36:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> However, I think the presentation of the DIP needs some work. 
> For example, the rationales and lines of reasoning that 
> eventually led to the currently proposed syntax, both from the 
> original draft of this DIP and from the ensuing discussion in 
> the previous review thread, ought to be included (of course, in 
> summarized form -- no need to repeat the back-and-forth of the 
> original discussions, but just the eventual line of thought). 
> If possible, some of the discarded alternatives could be 
> mentioned along with the reasons why they were eventually 
> decided against.

The first draft of the current proposal actually started with 
this approach: 
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/commit/677c4e2bd5ff9b4bcbca35a28831560d5ce06f8c

Hopefully this will help:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/88