D easily overlooked?

[Ali via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 12:47:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 11:28:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> I had assumed D was designed to be a GC language from the 
>> outset.
>
> The D memory model is still in flux and always allowed C-like 
> memory management. Whereas both Go and Java sacrificed fast C 
> interfacing from the early days to get proper GC support, so 
> there is a qualitative difference in the assumptions made in 
> the language designs.
>


I am obviously not a language design or implementation expert, 
but what you said, does it mean that D cannot have a fast GC by 
design