D easily overlooked?

[Seb via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 13:34:18 UTC, Ali wrote:
> On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 12:47:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 11:28:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>>> I had assumed D was designed to be a GC language from the 
>>> outset.
>>
>> The D memory model is still in flux and always allowed C-like 
>> memory management. Whereas both Go and Java sacrificed fast C 
>> interfacing from the early days to get proper GC support, so 
>> there is a qualitative difference in the assumptions made in 
>> the language designs.
>>
>
>
> I am obviously not a language design or implementation expert, 
> but what you said, does it mean that D cannot have a fast GC by 
> design

http://www.infognition.com/blog/2014/the_real_problem_with_gc_in_d.html