DIP 1011--extern(delegate)--Preliminary Review Round 1

[Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 15:27:10 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
>> I don't like it so much but also something like this could be 
>> considered:
>> 
>> out!(x => x>0)
>> or
>> out!x(x > 0)
>> 
>> that can't collide with current syntax
>
> I think you meant this for DIP 1009?
>
> -Steve

You're right, I had too many windows opened :)

Andrea