DIP 1012--Attributes--Preliminary Review Round 1

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 23:27:53 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>
>> Might be useful to mention why not included.
>
> This DIP focuses on function (i.e. @-like attributes), the rest 
> of those attributes are storage classes/visibility classes or 
> parametric in a way that doesn't fit with this DIP (extern(C++, 
> A.B), package(foo) align(N).

So then you might make that more clear, such as by re-titling it 
"Function Attributes" instead of "Attributes" and change language 
in certain locations, like in the abstract, to refer to function 
attributions specifically instead of all attributes.