DIP 1012--Attributes--Preliminary Review Round 1

[Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 00:20:25 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 23:27:53 UTC, Nicholas Wilson 
> wrote:
>>
>>> Might be useful to mention why not included.
>>
>> This DIP focuses on function (i.e. @-like attributes), the 
>> rest of those attributes are storage classes/visibility 
>> classes or parametric in a way that doesn't fit with this DIP 
>> (extern(C++, A.B), package(foo) align(N).
>
> So then you might make that more clear, such as by re-titling 
> it "Function Attributes" instead of "Attributes" and change 
> language in certain locations, like in the abstract, to refer 
> to function attributions specifically instead of all attributes.

Thats a good idea.