GPGPU progess

Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 3 05:13:41 PDT 2017


On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 11:58:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
> Is it possible to convince the compiler to emit code built for 
> the backend target directly into the same object file as the 
> host code?
> I feel like this should be possible, along the lines of
> __attribute__((target(...)) to convince the compiler to 
> generate code for a few functions with different targets than 
> the module?
>

Alas no. __attribute__((target(...)) works because it targeting 
different targets of the _same_ backend, this targets different 
backends.

> Using solutions as you suggest above introduces dependent build 
> sequencing into the build script. Different build systems might 
> prove to be more or less difficult to integrate cleanly, and 
> many people use build-script generators which might need to 
> learn a few new tricks.
>

Hence why I made reading from disk (with a predictable output 
name) a viable option.
Any build script trickery would simply just feed in slightly 
later down the pipeline of.

read file from disk -> in memory -> compute API -> binary -> 
execute

Also thats how using other kernels not written in D would work, 
just plug somewhere into the pipeline.

> 'Expertise' is possibly not the word I'd suggest ;)
> But I'll have some established software by that time that I'd 
> love to attempt to port, we can work through rough edges 
> together when you're available. No rush.

Great. Heh, still more experience than I have. Looking forward to 
it, earliest would probably be August.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list