std.csv Performance Review

[Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 04:25:27 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Even though the issue can be ignored, the overhead of parsing 
> to identify issues still remains. I haven't attempted write the 
> algorithm assuming proper data structure so I don't know what 
> the performance would look like, but I suspect it isn't 
> negligible. There is also likely some overhead for providing 
> the tokens through range interfaces.

Immediate idea is to have the cake and eat it too with 
parseXML!(Yes.validate)(...), but more work.