sqlite3 vs. sqlite-d

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 20:12:22 UTC, cym13 wrote:

> It should be noted that the benchmark isn't fair, it favours 
> the sqlite3 implementation as parsing and preparing the 
> statement isn't measured. And yes, it's still faster which is 
> cool ^^
>

Yes the benchmark is biased slightly in favor of sqlite3 C 
implementation.
But sqlite-d does not have the ability to parse sql to the point 
where it could implement that functionality.
Also sqlite-d is inefficient in quite a few places and is slowed 
down by auto-decoding as I discovered just now.