Re: Isn't it about time for D3?
ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 10 17:27:06 PDT 2017
Liam McGillivray wrote:
> I feel like D3 would see significantly wider adoption than D2 ever got,
> as long as it successfully solves the problems of D2.
..and it actually should be D1.5, not D3. ;-) 'cause D3 implies even more
features, and i feel that the way to get The Perfect D (sorry! ;-) is
trying to cut all the features that aren't strictly necessary (including
fat-free stdlib too: i see stdlib as a part of the language).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list