Re: Isn't it about time for D3?

ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 10 17:27:06 PDT 2017


Liam McGillivray wrote:

> I feel like D3 would see significantly wider adoption than D2 ever got, 
> as long as it successfully solves the problems of D2.

..and it actually should be D1.5, not D3. ;-) 'cause D3 implies even more 
features, and i feel that the way to get The Perfect D (sorry! ;-) is 
trying to cut all the features that aren't strictly necessary (including 
fat-free stdlib too: i see stdlib as a part of the language).


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list