Re: Isn't it about time for D3?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

Liam McGillivray wrote:

> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 00:27:06 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> ..and it actually should be D1.5, not D3. ;-) 'cause D3 implies even 
>> more features, and i feel that the way to get The Perfect D (sorry! ;-) 
>> is trying to cut all the features that aren't strictly necessary 
>> (including fat-free stdlib too: i see stdlib as a part of the language).
>
> D1.5? What?  This has nothing to do with D1. 

and D1.5 too. sure it should be forked from D2, and then it should be made 
*smaller*. which, essentially, makes it D1.5, not D3. besides, it will be 
very fun explaining people that we have D1, then D2, and the newest version 
is D1.5. people will blog/tweet this, for sure. free PR!