Expressing range constraints in CNF form

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 11 09:45:08 PDT 2017


On 6/11/17 12:15 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Exposing magic functions which are recognized by name strikes me as 
> being worse then proper compiler intrinsics.

This is brainstorming. Let's follow up with better ideas in addition to 
pointing out flaws in the ideas on the table.

To this point: .msg would solve the problem of "msg" being defined in 
the current scope (assuming of course msg is defined in object.d).


Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list