Expressing range constraints in CNF form
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 11 09:45:08 PDT 2017
On 6/11/17 12:15 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Exposing magic functions which are recognized by name strikes me as
> being worse then proper compiler intrinsics.
This is brainstorming. Let's follow up with better ideas in addition to
pointing out flaws in the ideas on the table.
To this point: .msg would solve the problem of "msg" being defined in
the current scope (assuming of course msg is defined in object.d).
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list