Re: Isn't it about time for D3?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:

> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 05:24:25 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> and D1.5 too. sure it should be forked from D2, and then it should be 
>> made *smaller*. which, essentially, makes it D1.5, not D3. besides, it 
>> will be very fun explaining people that we
>
> D--?
>
> Out of curiosity; wouldn't it be better to start with one of the 
> alternative compilers that are being worked on (SDC or others), or are 
> they no longer active?

to remove features, it is nice to *have* those features first. and there 
are no other feature-complete frontends besides dmdfe.