Supporting musl libc

[Joakim via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 15:19:00 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Dne 10.10.2016 v 15:27 openwrt via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
>
>> On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 15:48:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 13:38:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-10-08 20:47, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is the current status? Without support of musl-libc, I 
>>>>> can not ad support for a Alpine linux distribution. It is a 
>>>>> shame because they already have go and rust support.
>>>>
>>>> I've not worked at this at all. For my use case it was 
>>>> easier to just build in Docker instead.
>>>
>>> I solved this by using libexecinfo library from freebsd
>>
>> openwrt also use musl,  and I can not run my d code on 
>> it(unless I rebuild everythings with glic).
> Yes, even libexecinfo does not fixed all issues, we really need 
> to add other C runtimes. In D runtime and phobos there is a lot 
> of places which  wrongly use version(linux) instead of 
> CRuntime_Glibc.

Sorry, didn't see your comment till this thread was just bumped.  
I was the one who separated out linux and Glibc in druntime, I 
noted then that some blocks were still mixed:

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1010#issuecomment-69815792

Also, it's possible others are still adding Glibc stuff as just 
linux, as that's happened a couple times since then, but I don't 
follow it and tell them to change it, as it usually doesn't 
affect me on Android.  If these are affecting you, submit a pull 
for druntime and ping me, I'll review it.