atomic operations compared to c++

rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 14 05:50:05 PDT 2017


On 14/06/2017 1:48 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:27 +0100, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>>
> […]
>> Yes. A N.G. post will be forgotten about quickly, but an issue in
>> the
>> bug tracker can send you updates as things progress.
> 
> OK. Feel free to sign me up for the issue.

If an issue is created, you can add yourself pretty easily (cc field).

>> At the end of the day, that module grew organically, it just needs a
>> bit
>> of planning put into it for the future that's all.
> 
> Which module?

core.atomic



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list