Re: Isn't it about time for D3?
ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 14 13:45:43 PDT 2017
Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 12:22:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> If a code is to be left untouched but the compiler not archived then the
>> code must be recompiled and amended as needed with each new compiler
>> that is accepted in the workflow.
>
> I don't disagree with the general sentiment than one have to evolve the
> codebase along with the tooling, but if C, C++, Python and JavaScript
> didn't provide backwards compatibility in their maintained "production
> lines"
at least C doesn't: almost all old-enough code is broken by various "UB".
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list