dmd -betterC
ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 20 23:21:37 PDT 2017
Sebastien Alaiwan wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 05:35:42 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> asserts on embedded systems? O_O code built without -release for
>> embedded systems? O_O
>
> embedded system != production system.
>
> You still need to debug the code, and at some point, you have to load it
> on a real microcontroller ; this is where some of your assumptions about
> how the chip works might turn out to be false.
as i said, in "betterc" mode compiler can omit generation of assert
condition strings.
but refusing to generate such strings for *all* code in favor of embedded
cases is like "let's remove classes and exceptions from D, 'cause they're
too costly for embedded code!"
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list