DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

[Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 12:43:46 UTC, meppl wrote:
>
> yeah, i was probably not thinking too carefully about it. My 
> idea was to keep the code readable, if the contracts are long. 
> but as long as the "do" must appear behind a '}', everything is 
> still fine, more or less.
>
> both are readable, but one time we write `do` and the other 
> time we dont. furthermore the second function body looks a 
> little bit like belonging to "out". someone who is learning the 
> D-language might get confused.

Oh, I hadn't thought about mixing the two syntax forms. I would 
just forbid it. Your signature then uses *either* the verbose 
form, *or* the compact form.