DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

[MysticZach via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:11:12 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
> As long as one is doing this, maybe a proposal for user-defined 
> `assert` should be provided too? It'd be interesting to have a 
> dedicated file for user-defined assert and contract 
> configuration. The core idea is to allow *everyone*, from large 
> companies to individual hobbyists, to use `assert`, `in`, and 
> `out`, and have it work the way they want. I would definitely 
> need help writing that DIP.

:-)