DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 23 11:20:23 PDT 2017


On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:03:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 23.06.2017 18:21, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> [...]
>> 
>
> Agreed. Implementation:
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/compare/master...tgehr:contract-syntax
>
> (At most one contract of each type is supported. It is not very 
> hard to implement multiple contracts, but this requires 
> touching semantic analysis.)

Holy ***. I set aside some time this weekend to try implementing 
this myself as an exercise, but oh well. Thanks!


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list