DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/24/17 8:26 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:

> I would simply copy the current assert grammar into a separate contract 
> grammar, so that further modifications to the assert grammar do not 
> change the new contract grammar.
> But as I said, it's not important to me, it was just an 
> observation/question. Should the need ever arise for (new) contract and 
> assert grammar to diverge it can be dealt with then by whoever does the 
> diverging.

Exactly, we can cross that bridge when (if) it happens.

-Steve