DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 14:09:40 UTC, Enamex wrote:
>
> It has the already used `typeof(return)` going for it, though.
>

That's why I had suggested it above. However, I think the point 
they raised about parsing in response was a good one.