If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 22:25:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> But again, the elephant in the room is that in the good ole 
> clear-weather days, such an error would at most take out one or 
> two (or a small handful) of related sites; whereas in today's 
> cloudy situation a single error in umbrella services like AWS 
> can mean the outage of thousands or maybe even millions of 
> otherwise-unrelated sites.

Well, but on average the outcome (SLA) is better, assuming that 
they can have more specialised personell and spend more time on 
harnessing the infrastructure.

It's just that you get global scale downtime.