If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[XavierAP via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 12:42:37 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 22:07:51 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
>> Plus statistics can prove nothing -- this logical truth cannot 
>> be overstated.
>
> It's called empirical evidence and it's one of the most 
> important techniques in science[2] to create foundation for a 
> hypothesis.

No, mistaking historical data as empirically valid is the most 
dangerous scientific mistake. The empirical method requires all 
conditions to be controlled, in order for factors to be isolated, 
and every experiment to be reproducible.