If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[XavierAP via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 12:42:37 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
> Doing anything else is reckless endangerment since it gives you 
> the feeling of being safe without actually being safe. Like 
> using @safe in D, or Rust, and being unaware of unsafe code 
> hidden from you behind "safe" facades.

Safe code should be unable to call unsafe code -- including 
interop with any non-D or binary code, here I agree. I was 
supposing this is already the case in D but I'm not really sure.