Multi-commit PRs vs. multiple single-commit PRs

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 12:49:22 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 11:59:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> Then it should have been 2 PR or more to begin with. Splitting 
>> PR in smaller ones is a good practice in general,
>
> This is probably true for many cases, but I don't think it's a 
> general truth.

Let's please not conflate a small technical discussion about how 
to preserve information in git (e.g. squash vs. merge vs. rebase) 
with a workflow debate about proper PR size.