Is it acceptable to not parse unittest blocks when unittests are disabled ?

[XavierAP via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 at 11:16:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>
> Is that an acceptable tradeof ?

I would consider this harmful... The spec already states this 
about unit tests, so I'd guess the decision was taken in the past 
conscientiously.

If you're worried about compilation time, you can always define 
your unit tests in separate files that are included for 
compilation only when needed.