[OT] Algorithm question

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 11:15:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> But permutations is the way to go if you want scientific 
> quality.

I take that back:

«Polynomial pseudo-random number generator via cyclic phase»
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475409001463

Might be what you are looking for and if not it probably 
references other papers that fits the bill.