DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 11:13:35 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> 100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no 
>> constructor is in the derived class.
>
> I think we could even split this up into two separate 
> proposals, because this part of the DIP is fairly 
> non-controversial and could be approved much faster (and 
> implementation-wise it should be fairly simple to support).

<3