DIP 1003 Formal Review
Meta via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun May 14 11:15:33 PDT 2017
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 at 16:35:32 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 16:17:03 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/fbb797f61ac92300eda1d63202157cd2a30ba555/DIPs/DIP1003.md
>
> Currently function declarations with contracts don't require
> semicolon at the end. This conflicts with options 1 and 3 and
> is not addressed in the DIP.
I'm confused as to how this conflicts with option 1. Can you
explain?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list