DIP 1003 Formal Review

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/16/17 3:43 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 16.05.2017 21:25, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> I'm specifically asking if just removing the 'keyword-ness' of it is not
>> doable for some reason.
>
> It's easy to do technically. (The bad thing about option 1 is that it's
> the kind of thing that would probably not arise from an up-front
> language design and requires history to explain.)

It's easy to explain. It looks better than just nothing between the two 
sets of braces :)

-Steve