DIP 1003 Formal Review

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 21:39:19 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>
> I agree with your points, but it doesn't necessarily preclude 
> adding in/out statements. My only qualm is that they would seem 
> very similar to scope statements. Perhaps scope(in) and 
> scope(out(x)) or something like that. Would not break any code 
> to do it.

I meant adding in/out statements without removing the in/out 
block functionality the way it is now.