[4Walter&Andrei] D is 40 times slower. We need a new language feature!
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 20 04:54:06 PDT 2017
On Saturday, 20 May 2017 at 11:47:32 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>
> What's surprising about it? Thinking very simplistically (I
> don't know how it actually works), if inlining happened first
> then surely the later optimisation stages wouldn't have a
> problem detecting the necessary loop invariants and hoisting
> them out.
Inlining is usually one of the first passes scheduled.
So that should not be an issue,
However loop-invariant code motion is not straight-forward.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list