DMD VS2017 Support

Jolly James via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 22 14:08:02 PDT 2017


On Monday, 22 May 2017 at 07:28:23 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 22:47:44 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
>> On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 18:30:53 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>>> Please note that the next dmd installer will also detect 
>>> VS2017 and setup directories correctly in sc.ini: 
>>> https://github.com/dlang/installer/pull/227
>>
>> I really like this philosophy:
>> "It does not work, a fix is available, but it won't be rolled 
>> out (for now). Who cares about those who cannot use the broken 
>> software?"
>
> Please don't antagonize volunteer contributors who are actually 
> creating and improving things. We have a release process for a 
> reason, we can't ship every single change immediately. If you 
> require a solution urgently, use a workaround or build it from 
> source yourself.

My message was neither addressed directly to anybody of the 
volunteer contributors (I have a huge respect of them and their 
great work), nor to anyone at the D Foundation directly. I just 
wanted to critize the whole release cycle stuff itself.

I mean, if for any circumstance, e.g. like the VS2017 thing 
(which did not suddenly appear from one day to another anyway), 
the whole software cannot be used without larger fiddling (in 
this case: setting up NSIS + plugins), it seems quite strange to 
not simply update the installer, which would be a work for a few 
minutes - and after that everybody would be happy.
But to be honest, I don't think that this is a problem of D. More 
or less, this is something that appears everywhere in the world 
of open-source. Here it annoys and chases away users, in the 
corporate sector you could not do so, as this would cause the 
company's ruin.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list