Value closures (no GC allocation)

[Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 03:14:14 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:

>
> Mike, I've read that README several times over. Yes, a mistake 
> was made, a number self-assigned. Yes, that is not how it's 
> done. Yes, we know. Yes. Thanks for the reminder. All is fixed.

Thanks. I wasn't criticizing. It wasn't fixed when I clicked the 
link, so I just wanted to make sure everyone's on the same page. 
I can't assume everyone has gone over the README.