Warning, ABI breakage from 2.074 to 2.075

[Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 26 May 2017 at 13:23:20 UTC, Jason King wrote:
> wanted to fix a problem with the underlying system.   Trying to 
> build
> something on top of an unstable ABI is building your 
> foundations on sand.
>
> All I’m saying is if no attention is going to be paid to this 
> (it doesn’t mean you can’t change the ABI, but it needs to be 
> managed it better than ‘whoops!’), just stop claiming the 
> systems bit and stay up stack where this isn’t a problem.

There is some truth to this as BeOS used C++, and ABI was a 
concern, but it really depends on the context. D has a too big 
runtime and too many runtime dependent features to be classified 
as a low level language anyway, though...