Should out/ref parameters require the caller to specify out/ref like in C#?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 05/30/2017 12:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 12:11 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 15:59:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 05/30/2017 05:48 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 06:13:39 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 02:12:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That definition currently there is more precise than the 
>>>>>> definition on that page has been historically...
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently, it is not. Do you have a reference to Walter's change 
>>>>> regarding `in` becoming just `const`? ...
>>>> Unfortunately, `in` was never implemented as `scope const`.
>>>
>>> Why would it need to be `const`? Thanks! -- Andrei
>>
>> What do you mean?
> 
> I think `scope` would be enough. People should still be able to modify 
> the value. -- Andrei

Oh, I'm in a different movie - thought it's the associative array "in". 
Sorry! -- Andrei