Should out/ref parameters require the caller to specify out/ref like in C#?

Tue May 30 10:56:23 PDT 2017

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 06:13:39 Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 02:12:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > That definition currently there is more precise than the
> > definition on that page has been historically...
>
> Apparently, it is not. Do you have a reference to Walter's change
> regarding `in` becoming just `const`? Because a change like that
> should get reflected in the spec, otherwise we might just
> continue to ignore said spec and expect our grievances to be
> "gracefully" resolved later. What I mean is I'd rather see/make
> the change reflected there...

There was a thread discussing it here:

http://forum.dlang.org/post/zskxjpctdipbqalpwxbj@forum.dlang.org

with Walter's main response being here:

http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6m17i$1jh7$1@digitalmars.com

- Jonathan M Davis