Project Elvis

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 17:27:30 UTC, bauss wrote:
> Which this operator has already proven to be in other 
> successful languages.

Not exactly this variation, but I get your point. On the other 
hand, so has hundreds of other operators from other languages... 
So which one should one not implement?

Anyway, I've already shared my viewpoints on the flaws of "?:" as 
proposed.