"body" keyword is unnecessary
Meta
jared771 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 19 21:07:53 UTC 2017
On Sunday, 19 November 2017 at 12:54:37 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> Yeah, "no worries" but for example a few weeks ago a bug report
> has drawn my attention:
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17925
>
> After testing some code with i've indeed observed that the
> transition period for `do` had started...
>
> "since when ?" i've wondered.
>
> Good question, it's even not in the changelog:
>
> https://www.google.fr/search?domains=dlang.org&dcr=0&biw=1280&bih=635&tbs=qdr%3Ay&ei=H34RWpKDPIzTgAatnqK4DA&q=body+do+site%3Adlang.org%2Fchangelog&oq=body+do+site%3Adlang.org%2Fchangelog&gs_l=psy-ab.3...4014.4428.0.4779.3.3.0.0.0.0.67.190.3.3.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.AOIgJDEhh_g
>
> So maybe it's wort mentioning something like
>
> "(formerly body, which is still allowed during ....)", because
> there's been a communication problem with that deprecation.
Yes, I'm pretty sure I created the PR to remove all references to
`body` myself. It's part of the process; the first step is
removing it from the documentation, because outright deprecation
is too sudden. It's still perfectly usable, but we don't want to
advertise it anymore.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list