Time to move logger from experimental to std ?

[Basile B.]

On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:14:57 UTC, Claude wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the 
>> std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic 
>> style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is 
>> achieved ?
>
> I tried deriving FileLogger class to implement my own log 
> fomatting. I overrided beginLogMsg, logMsgPart or finishLogMsg, 
> but I could not do anything with it because the handle "file_" 
> is private (so I cannot access it within the derived class).
>
> So I ended up rewriting my own FileLogger deriving directly 
> from Logger and copying most of the Phobos version code, but 
> that's not convenient.
>
> Did I miss anything?

Sorry but yes, i think so, the handle is indirectly accessible 
with "FileLogger.file.fileno".