Proposal: Object/?? Destruction

[aberba]

  Upon reading this, It triggered an idea.
>
> On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler 
> wrote:
>> https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
>>
>> I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived.  Was this 
>> proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh?  
>> Named parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in 
>> my opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax 
>> with language support.  I'd be willing to refresh the DIP so 
>> long as I know the idea has not already been rejected.

DIP reminds me of object destruction.

/* extracts success & message from returned type. Could be tuple 
or structure, etc. May even eliminate use of tuples for multiple 
return
*/

auto {success, message} = callVoldermortFunction();

  This is concept is used in Kotlin. JavaScript es6 takes it even 
further (function parameters and arguments support object 
destruction)