D on quora ...

Laeeth Isharc laeeth at nospamlaeeth.com
Sat Oct 7 03:15:41 UTC 2017


On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 01:00:41 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
> On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 18:42:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:09:58PM +0000, Ali via 
>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> The reputation is D's GC is slow, and Manual Memory 
>>> Management is fast
>>
>> The first point is valid (when are we going to get a better 
>> GC? :-/), but the second is questionable.
>
> Have there been studies quantifying the performance of D's GC 
> relative to other GC implementations? My anecdotal experience 
> is that D's GC can have undesirable latency behavior (long 
> pauses), but throughput appears good. Of course, quantified 
> metrics would be far preferable to anecdotal observations.
>
> --Jon

Have you tried running the GC instrumentation on your tsv 
utilities? That might make for a very interesting blog post.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list