My two cents

[Satoshi]

On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 08:06:55 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 07:17:08 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
>> On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 21:42:03 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>>> On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 21:14:18 UTC, bauss wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 12:48:33 UTC, Atila Neves 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Okay, but what about now?
>>>>
>>>> void sendAMessage(string message)
>>>> {
>>>>     ....
>>>> }
>>>
>>> sendAMessage(text(...));
>>>
>>> Atila
>>
>> boilerplate...
>
> True, but in my opinion not enough to justify complicating the 
> language. One could also always do:
>
> import std.conv: t = text;
> sendAMessage(t("Foo is ", foo, " and bar is ", bar"));
>
> If it were me I'd just make `sendAMessage` take a variadic 
> template and call text internally.
>
> Atila

so, we should complicate source code instead of the language?

Actually, you provide one of the best examples why we should add 
this syntactic sugar.