Advice requested for fixing issue 17914

[Nemanja Boric]

On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 15:12:27 UTC, Nemanja Boric 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 14:19:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 09:26:26 Steven Schveighoffer 
>> via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Maybe there was a change in the OS(es) being used that 
>> affected the limit?
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> Yes, the stack is not immediately unmapped because it's very 
> common
> just to reset the fiber and reuse it for handling the new 
> connection -
> creating new fibers (and doing unmap on termination) is a 
> problem in the
> real life (as this is as well).
>
> At sociomantic we already had this issue: 
> https://github.com/sociomantic-tsunami/tangort/issues/2 Maybe 
> this is the way to go - I don't see a reason why every stack 
> should be mmaped separately.

I'm not sure that would allow us to mprotect the page guards, 
though.