Note from a donor

[codephantom]

On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 22:46:27 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Even .NET Framework and Core forward to the highly vetted 
> system crypto API's (SChannel on Windows and OpenSSL on 
> Linux/macOS). If you need RSA crypto in D, pull in OpenSSL. 
> Period. Everything else is a good way to run afoul of a 
> security audit, and potentially expose yourself.
>
> Phobos could forward to these system provided API's like .NET 
> does and provide an idiomatic D interface, but Phobos itself 
> should absolutely and 110% stay out of the crypto 
> implementation business.

I agree. D just needs an interface to Encryption providers.

I cannot see how anyone would consider anything other than a 
provider model, for something that is so highly complex and 
specialised.