Bug in function parameters type matching

[EntangledQuanta via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 9 September 2017 at 21:27:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe 
wrote:
> On Saturday, 9 September 2017 at 21:15:10 UTC, EntangledQuanta 
> wrote:
>> What's the point then of even having an enum parameter?
>
> You must pass the enum to the enum parameter. Implicit casting 
> only goes one way.
>
> You are just also allowed to pass the enum to an int parameter.

I think it should be only implicitly castable if you explicitly 
set the type on the enum.

Surely you see how semantically wrong calling foo in the last 
examples I gave?