lazy import, an alternative to DIP 1005

[Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 15:45:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 14:45:01 UTC, Jonathan Marler 
> wrote:
>>
>> Note that instead of introducing the "lazy" modifier here, we 
>> could just modify static imports to be lazy which would mean 
>> no new syntax and every benefits from the feature without 
>> changing their code, that is, if they are using static imports 
>> :)
>>
>
> That DIP already has a section titled "Alternative: Lazy 
> Imports" that discusses this idea, also in context of static 
> imports.

Lol, that's exactly what I was suggesting :)  Thanks for pointing 
that out.