Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?
Daniel Kozak
kozzi11 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 21 13:46:49 UTC 2017
Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or
without VibeManualMemoryManagement
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement
> helped in some cases too.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>>
>> {
>> "name": "vibedtest",
>> "targetName": "vibedtest",
>> "targetType": "executable",
>> "targetPath": "bin",
>> "dependencies": {
>> "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>> },
>> "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>> "versions": [
>> "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>> ],
>> "buildTypes": {
>> "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize",
>> "inline"],
>> "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
>> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <
>> digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>
>>>> wrong version, this is my letest version:
>>>> https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>> Updated.
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20170921/99e7523f/attachment.html>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list